Board decisions are often perceived as the outcome of collective will and formal voting – the minutes are signed, quorum is met, the resolution is adopted. However, as Professor ...
Read More
The law is not always used to protect violated interests – in many cases, it is turned into an instrument of pressure. Formally, the claims may appear lawful, the statements lega...
Read More
Legal disputes rarely unfold in conditions of full transparency – at the initial stage, a client almost always has only fragments of information. Some documents are missing, the ...
Read More
Conflicts of interest rarely appear obvious – more often, they are disguised as neutral involvement, formal mediation, or a “technical” role within a process. As Professor Ga...
Read More
Situations in which statutory law and formal legal norms clearly support the client’s position, yet judicial practice develops against it, are among the most complex. As Professo...
Read More
The loss of evidence is almost always perceived as a verdict – the client is convinced that without correspondence, reports, records, primary documents, or confirmations of agree...
Read More
Civil proceedings are often perceived as something linear – a claim, a hearing, a judgment. Yet, as Professor Gabriel Steiner notes, real litigation rarely develops по прям...
Read More
In a legal dispute, the client often perceives key milestones – filing a claim, the first hearing, the decision – as separate events. However, as Professor Gabriel Steiner note...
Read More
In a legal conflict, the first statement of claim defines more than just the procedural starting point – it sets the language in which the court, the opposing party and the legal...
Read More
In many disputes it seems that everything depends on arguments, negotiation skills and strategy – but at the decisive moment the outcome is often defined by one missing or incorr...
Read More
